When it comes to extinction, most people connect it with the complete disappearance of dinosaurs or endangered species such as the wild water buffalos. In psychology, extinction carries a similar meaning to learned behavior.
What is Extinction (Psychology)
Extinction in psychology refers to the fading and disappearance of behavior that was previously learned by association with another event.
Examples of Extinction
A child learns that throwing a tantrum at the grocery checkout counter will cause his mom to buy him candies. He associates tantrum-throwing with getting-candies.
But this reaction doesn’t last forever. As mom stops giving in to those fits, the child throws fewer and fewer tantrums and stops altogether eventually. The learned tantrums have been extinct.
Extinction in Classical Conditioning
Classical conditioning occurs when an association is formed between a biologically significant natural stimulus and a neutral stimulus to cause an involuntary response.
The natural stimulus is an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) because it doesn’t require any conditioning to cause the reaction. The neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS), and the involuntary response becomes a conditioned response (CR).
The case of Pavlov’s dogs is the most famous example. Ivan Pavlov rang a bell every time he fed his dogs. Eventually, they began to salivate every time they heard the sound, whether or not they received food. The natural salivation became a conditioned response.
In classical conditioning, extinction occurs when the conditioned stimulus is applied repeatedly without being paired with the unconditioned stimulus. Over time, the learned behavior occurs less often and eventually stops altogether, and conditioned stimulus returns to neural.
In the example of Pavlov’s dogs, after Pavlov subsequently rang the bell many times without bringing food, the dogs gradually stopped salivating at the sound.
Extinction in Operant Conditioning
Operant extinction refers to the weakening and eventual stop of the voluntary, conditioned response.
For example, a child associates the sound of a microwave with her favorite snack, and she rushes into the kitchen. But after dad uses the microwave several times without making the snack, she gradually stops.
The Road to Extinction Can Be Bumpy
The extinction process takes time. And it is not always straightforward or “clean-cut.”
An extinction burst is a temporary increase in frequency, duration, or magnitude of the conditioned behavior during the extinction process. During this period, the extinct behavior repeats more in an attempt to bring back the unconditioned stimulus.
For instance, a parent may try to use differential attention – increase attention for good behavior and no attention for bad behavior – to extinct a child’s challenging behavior. However, the child may act up more to try to get back the parents’ attention1.
Extinct Behavior May Come Back After Extinction
Extinction doesn’t mean the behavior is gone forever. Spontaneous recovery is the sudden return of the previously extinct behavior.
Extinction burst can also turn into extinction-induced aggression when the individual increases the extinct behavior or uses a different undesired behavior aggressively to try to get back the lost reinforcement2.
What Influences Resistance to Extinction
The schedules of reinforcement play a significant role in how resistant a learned behavior is to extinction. A continuous schedule reinforces the conditioned response every time while a partial schedule reinforces only some of the times.
Behavior acquired under partial reinforcement schedule is more resistant to extinction than action acquired under continuous reinforcement. This phenomenon is called the Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect (PREE)3.
One good illustration of the resistance to extinction property is gambling. Gambling addiction, especially slot machine addiction, is notoriously hard to extinct. When gambling, a gambler wins some of the time, but not all of the time. This partial reinforcement significantly increases the resistance to addiction extinction4.
Another factor that influences extinction is context. Context refers to anything in the environment. It could be scenery, location, or presence of other objects.
Let’s say a target behavior is acquired in context A and the extinction process carries out in the same context. After extinction completes, meaning an individual doesn’t react to the conditioned stimulus anymore, presenting the conditioned stimulus in another environment may result in the spontaneous recovery of the extinct behavior5.
One way to improve the success of extinction is to perform it in multiple contexts, which increases the chance that cues present at extinction will be present in different settings6.
Extinction Doesn’t Erase Previous Learning
Because of the possibility of spontaneous recovery and dependance on context, psychologists now believe that extinction is not an unlearning process. Rather, it is a form of new learning, called extinction learning7.
Instead of erasing previous learning, the individual learns a new association between the conditioned stimulus and the lack of unconditioned stimulus8.
Final Words on Extinction in Psychology
Extinction is a complicated process in which behavioral and neurological responses are linked tightly together. It is not a process that we have a complete understanding. Scientists are still uncovering the different components at play.
The difficulty in extinguishing an undesired behavior in their children can be frustrating for parents. But before jumping to the “my child is stubborn” or “I have a strong-willed child” conclusion, apply the extinction process consistently in different settings. Patience and practice can pay off.
- 1.Sajwaj TE, Pinkston S, Cordua G, et al. Adverse effects of differential parental attention1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973:15-30. doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-15
- 2.Lerman DC, Iwata BA, Wallace MD. SIDE EFFECTS OF EXTINCTION: PREVALENCE OF BURSTING AND AGGRESSION DURING THE TREATMENT OF SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. March 1999:1-8. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-1
- 3.Humphreys LG. The effect of random alternation of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. August 1939:141-158. doi:10.1037/h0058138
- 4.Redish AD, Jensen S, Johnson A, Kurth-Nelson Z. Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: Implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Review. July 2007:784-805. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.3.784
- 5.Laborda MA, Witnauer JE, Miller RR. Contrasting AAC and ABC renewal: the role of context associations. Learn Behav. December 2010:46-56. doi:10.3758/s13420-010-0007-1
- 6.Dunsmoor JE, Niv Y, Daw N, Phelps EA. Rethinking Extinction. Neuron. October 2015:47-63. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.028
- 7.Goodman J, Packard MG. There Is More Than One Kind of Extinction Learning. Front Syst Neurosci. May 2019. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00016
- 8.Wellman CL, Moench KM. Preclinical studies of stress, extinction, and prefrontal cortex: intriguing leads and pressing questions. Psychopharmacology. September 2018:59-72. doi:10.1007/s00213-018-5023-4