Resilience theory is the conceptual framework for understanding how some individuals can bounce back after experiencing an adverse situation in a strength-focused approach1.
What Is Resilience
Natural disasters, crime, war, accidents, and abuse are unfortunate but sometimes unavoidable parts of life. Psychologists, psychiatrists, and pediatricians have long been fascinated by the striking fact that some children come out relatively unscathed in the face of adversity while others crumble.
Contrary to popular belief, resilience is not a personality trait but a dynamic process or system to adapt successfully to threats and adversities in life2.
Who Developed Resilience Theory
Resilience Theory is a collective resilience model contributed by many researchers. Notable contributors are Norman Garmezy, who initiated the Project Competence Longitudinal Study (PCLS)3, and Masten, Tellegen from the University of Minnesota.
The roots of resilience studies can be traced back to half a century ago when psychologists studied the outcomes of children at high risk for psychopathology.
Among these children, a subgroup did not develop any psychopathological disorder and grew up with surprisingly healthy patterns.
In the past, psychology researchers often focused on identifying risk factors and vulnerabilities that could contribute to poor outcomes in children4.
This deficit-focused approach in developmental research was replaced by a strength-focused approach when resilience researchers started looking into the positive variables that contributed to good outcomes in at-risk children.
The Resilience Theory was a paradigm shift that explains what and how these promotive factors work to help children overcome the negative impacts of risk exposure5,6.
Resilience Theory Characteristics
Unlike most other theories, resilience theories are not a set of determined hypotheses or principles.
Rather, it is a framework that keeps evolving as researchers learn more through studies and analyses.
There have been four waves of resilience research that have continuously refined and redefined resilience theory7.
Among the many different models of resilience theory, several common characteristics have emerged and are agreed upon by most resilience theorists.
1. Static Traits vs. Dynamic Process
In the early days of resilience research, psychologists focused on identifying the personality traits responsible for the positive outcomes in that subset of children.
The assumption was that resilience was created by some static internal quality of an individual.
Over time, researchers realized that resilience is more than just personality traits. Instead, resilience is the capacity of a dynamic process to adapt successfully to disturbances that threaten a child’s function and development8.
2. Extraordinary Assets vs Ordinary Resources
Early resilience researchers often described children who showed resilient adaptation as invulnerable or invincible, as if only certain extraordinary people could overcome extremely harsh conditions.
Researchers later found that resilience was quite common9 in human development when the operation of basic adaptation systems was protected and in good working order. If those systems were impaired during child development, then the risk for developmental problems became much higher.
Resilience expert, Ann S. Masten, called this the Ordinary Magic10 because it’s the ordinary resource, not extraordinary quality, that protects us.
Three protective factors protect the adaptation systems: individual, family, and community.
Although individual assets such as temperament, intelligence, and gender contribute to resilience, factors outside of us often play a significant role in determining whether a person can adapt positively.
One can draw these ordinary resources from family and community, such as parental support, adult mentors, a close community, and a safe neighborhood.
3. Fixed vs. Variable
Another new concept about resilience is that it can potentially fluctuate over time and across different domains.
Adaptation is not a fixed system; rather, it is a developmental progression with new strengths and vulnerabilities coming from different life events over time.
Resilience is also not an across-the-board phenomenon.
A child can adapt well in one domain but struggle in another.
4. Resilience Theory vs Resiliency Theory
Because resilience is a dynamic process and most protective factors come from outside of an individual, many researchers now refer to it as resilience or resilient adaptation rather than resiliency or resilient child because the latter implies it is only a quality of the individual.
Also See: A child whose parents are dead
Final Thoughts On Resilience Theory
Resilience is a simple concept — bouncing back after adversity. But defining resilience, as well as analyzing and understanding it, is a complex subject in psychology. Many resilience models have been developed, and ongoing neuroscience studies have contributed to the understanding.
Despite the research complexity, one thing is obvious and simple for parents: to build resilience, we have to do our part to connect with our children and provide good parenting.
- 1.MASTEN AS, OBRADOVIC J. Competence and Resilience in Development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Published online December 1, 2006:13-27. doi:10.1196/annals.1376.003
- 2.Southwick SM, Bonanno GA, Masten AS, Panter-Brick C, Yehuda R. Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. Published online October 2014:25338. doi:10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338
- 3.Masten AS, Tellegen A. Resilience in developmental psychopathology: Contributions of the Project Competence Longitudinal Study. Dev Psychopathol. Published online April 17, 2012:345-361. doi:10.1017/s095457941200003x
- 4.Zimmerman MA. Resiliency Theory. Health Educ Behav. Published online July 17, 2013:381-383. doi:10.1177/1090198113493782
- 5.Fergus S, Zimmerman MA. ADOLESCENT RESILIENCE: A Framework for Understanding Healthy Development in the Face of Risk. Annu Rev Public Health. Published online April 21, 2005:399-419. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357
- 6.Fraser MW, Galinsky MJ, Richman JM. Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research. Published online September 1, 1999:131-143. doi:10.1093/swr/23.3.131
- 7.Wright MO, Masten AS, Narayan AJ. Resilience Processes in Development: Four Waves of Research on Positive Adaptation in the Context of Adversity. In: Handbook of Resilience in Children. Springer US; 2012:15-37. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3661-4_2
- 8.Masten AS. Global Perspectives on Resilience in Children and Youth. Child Dev. Published online December 16, 2013:6-20. doi:10.1111/cdev.12205
- 9.Bonanno GA. Loss, Trauma, and Human Resilience: Have We Underestimated the Human Capacity to Thrive After Extremely Aversive Events? American Psychologist. Published online 2004:20-28. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20
- 10.Masten AS. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist. Published online 2001:227-238. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227